Guidelines were adapted from the following sources:
Oxford Code Review Network guidelines for reviewers: https://github.com/OxfordCodeReviewNet/forum/blob/master/guidelines_for_reviewers.md
Introduction to Contemporary Peer Review Practices in Research Software given by Jeff Carver at the 2019 URSSI Winter school.
Petre, Marian, and Greg Wilson. “Code review for and by scientists.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.5648 (2014). https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648
MacLeod, Laura, et al. “Code reviewing in the trenches: Challenges and best practices.” IEEE Software 35.4 (2017): 34-42. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7950877/
https://codecheck.org.uk/ provides workflow, guidelines and tools for code review as part of peer review for publication.
Checklists from the Turing Way Guide to Reproducible Research chapter on code review: https://the-turing-way.netlify.app/reproducible-research/reviewing/reviewing-checklist.html
“Code reviews: the lab meeting for code”, Fernando Perez http://fperez.org/py4science/code_reviews.html
“Research Code Review: Best practices, Challenges and Opportunities”, Emmy Tsang https://osc-delft.github.io/posts/2021/09/03/Research-Code-Review/
Michaela Greiler on Code Reviews https://www.se-radio.net/2020/02/episode-400-michaela-greiler-on-code-reviews/